- Advertisement -

Inside look at Inhabit IQ: GSV combines commercial, residential, and short-term rental technology under proptech umbrella.

Must read

Amy Hinote
Amy Hinotehttps://vrmintel.com
Amy Hinote is the founder and editor-in-chief of VRM Intel Magazine, which provides news, information and resources for the professionally managed vacation rental industry. With a background in finance and over 15 years in the vacation rental industry, Hinote has worked with property management companies, technology companies, intermediaries and investors, and provides insider information about the growing vacation rental industry. She also founded the data company, now known as Key Data Dashboard, which provides aggregated market intelligence and reporting for vacation rental managers. Hinote resides between Alabama's Gulf Coast and Evanston, Illinois.

Greater Sum Ventures (GSV) began making waves in the vacation rental (VR) industry late last year as news spread that the long-term equity firm was making majority-stake investments in several VR technology companies, including Streamline Vacation Rental Software, Virtual Resort Manager, Rental Guardian, Bluetent, and BizCor.

In 2018, the company appeared to come from nowhere, and leaks of talks with dozens of other notable VR technology companies led to significant buzz in the industry, with property managers (PMs) asking who GSV is, what its plans are for these companies, how much of the VR tech industry will it roll up, and who will it acquire next.

In 2019, GSV added LiveRez, Lynnbrook, LSI Tools, and the VR franchise model iTrip. The addition of iTrip to the portfolio was particularly concerning for the VR industry because iTrip is technically a PM company. Was GSV trying to purchase the technology platforms to build a super-brand of property management franchises?

Related: LiveRez CEO Tracy Lotz and CFO Rich Cook out, Inhabit IQ to lead internal transition

Throughout its investment process, GSV kept a tight lid among media outlets about its plans, leaving the industry to speculate and its portfolioโ€™s leadership teams to field questions that they were unable to answer, except to say that nothing had changed: their road map was still intact, and they were still in control of their own companies.

 

Who is Inhabit IQ?

GSV is not new to investing in industry-specific technology solutions; the equity firm had accomplished two similar initiatives in ministry technology (Ministry Brands) and residential/commercial rental technology (Property Brands). Mirroring its investment strategy in these industries, it initially labeled the expanding VR portfolio as Vacation Brands.

However, GSVโ€™s leadership quickly began to identify synergies between the Property Brands and Vacation Brands collectives (more below). As a result, it created a new holding companyโ€”Inhabit IQโ€”which merged these two brands into one.

Inhabit IQ named a fresh leadership team over the newly formed holding companyโ€”including CRO Chad Scott and EVP, Vacation Division, Scott Butlerโ€”who recently reached out to VRM Intel to share the companyโ€™s plans, operating thesis, and vision for the future.

 

Company Structure

According to Inhabit IQโ€™s website,

โ€œInhabit IQ is a unique collective of tech-forward companies serving the vacation and property management industries. Our brands’ strategic partnerships deliver best-in-class software solutions and services while fostering innovation and collaboration with like-minded entrepreneurs and industry leaders. We believe that property managers should have the opportunity to choose platforms that best support their business goals and benefit from strategic partnerships across our ecosystem.โ€

Diving deeper, Inhabit IQ is a holding company providing an umbrella for 33 commercial, residential, and short-term rental technology companies.

Early in our conversation, Chad Scott bristled at the term โ€œrollupโ€ and explained that when he thinks of a rollup, he thinks about what other proptech companies have done when acquiring new platforms, including integrating all support systems, cutting staff, putting a halt on innovation, and forcing cross-selling of the customer base.

โ€œOur entire investment and operating thesis is based around doing the opposite,โ€ Chad said. โ€œWhen we think about our operating thesis, we are buying good companies, helping them pour gas on growth and pour gas on innovation, and sharing technology across companies. Over time, we will ease fears [among customers] that innovation doesnโ€™t stop; instead, it speeds up in our operating thesis. Platforms do not get sunset. They continue to drive forward. Leadership teams arenโ€™t removed. They will continue to be supported and have access to more resources where they were previously bootstrapped and growing out of their own balance sheet. Once [customers] see that things are not going to change, and not only that, but there is innovation, new opportunity, and new tech, that will eventually alleviate their fears.โ€

 

Inhabit IQ Isnโ€™t Looking to โ€œFlipโ€ the Portfolio

We asked, โ€œDo you intend to run these software companies in perpetuity?โ€

โ€œAbsolutely,โ€ Chad replied. โ€œAnd that is true for any of our portfolios. We have never packaged up and sold a portfolio.โ€

Upon hearing that we had heard rumors contrary to this position, Chad explained that confusion around this may result from a misinterpretation around future funding. In the companyโ€™s growth strategy, Inhabit IQ is likely to recapitalize the holding company as more resources are warranted to grow the whole.

โ€œWe are having to pay up for these companies, especially some of the more mature ones. Occasionally, what we will do when we need capital for investment is bring on a new capital partner or fund through which we can advance the portfolio. So I understand the technical misunderstanding.โ€

โ€œOur entire operating strategyโ€”and this is very clearly articulated as we are sitting down, post investment, with the companies that we are partnering withโ€”nothing should change,โ€ Chad continued. โ€œThey are still steering the ship, making the decisions, and driving the overall business strategy. We are here to support and provide resources where they need it. On the multi-family side, for example, we have 24 companies that we have invested in. They are all making the decisions, and they are all making pricing increases and decreases as they would normally do.โ€

When asked about the potential for rogue decisions by platform leaders, Chad offered a caveat, โ€œIf we see anything that is going to disrupt businessโ€”for example, if there are proposed price increases that we have found out about at the 11th hourโ€”we are going to go out and stop. We donโ€™t make any investments based on the requirement to raise or lower rates or to cut half of the staff for head-count synergy. That flies in the face of our operating strategy. We continue to support the leadership teams to make decisions for the business that they feel are the best ways to move forward. If we think [these decisions] might adversely affect the client base of otherwise, we will step in.โ€

 

Synergy between Commercial/Residential and Short-Term Rental Technology Platforms

Inhabit IQ added a CTO to its team, which is somewhat unusual for a holding company. As Chad explained, โ€œThe CTO is a critical piece that we didnโ€™t have initially. Once we invest in a company, our first question is โ€˜What do you needโ€”how can we help?โ€™ 95 percent of the time, looking at their road maps, there are many things they want to do, but they are just scraping the surface. In the multi-family sector, we started building up tech resources that our companies can use to continue driving growth. When we saw these same opportunities in the VR space, we moved over and executed the same playbookโ€”find the cool companies with great leadership teams and great product sets, and partner with them to figure out where they need gas.โ€

He continued, โ€œThere are also products in the multi-family space that have the potential to work well in the VR space and could plug in for VR clients. We didnโ€™t have the ability to share these resources without being affiliated, which led to combining the portfolios.โ€

Scott added that they are seeing many of their clients pick up a mix of rental propertiesโ€”including single-family homes, apartment rentals, and short-term vacation rentalsโ€”which require a unique product set to manage multiple types of rental activities.

 

With the Addition of iTrip, Is Inhabit IQ Looking to Compete with Its PMs?

According to Scott, the iTrip purchase was about the proprietary technology platform that iTrip had built, not about its property management services. โ€œThere is no plan to buy property management companies,โ€ Scott said. โ€œWe buy technology, and iTrip has the technology to power those franchises; but the interesting play there was not the property management companies themselves; it was growing that franchise model.โ€

Chad added, โ€œWe couldnโ€™t [acquire PMs] if we wanted to because the funds with which we are investing are technology funds, so we would have to go a totally different direction on the capital raise to even be able go down that road.โ€

Scott addressed concerns that PMs have about data sharing. โ€œWe are not in the business of using PMโ€™s data for anything other than they have agreed to, so we have to be really careful.โ€

 

Is Inhabit IQ Still Looking to Add VR Tech Companies to its Portfolio?

The team at Inhabit IQ is continuing to search for companies to round out the technology ecosystem in the VR industry. โ€œOur investment and operating thesis has always been to find very cool companies, innovative products, something that is almost disruptiveโ€”or that we can get disruptiveโ€”and then invest in them and help them grow faster with our support than they have alone,โ€ Chad said. โ€œThatโ€™s why, with all of our investment to date, these companies have never taken large seed rounds or Series A rounds; they donโ€™t have institutional investors because our assistance isnโ€™t as impactful.โ€

He added, โ€œIt is about productโ€”more importantly, not current state of product, but future state of product. That is attractive to us. When we see products that arenโ€™t quite where they need to be, but we know they can get there, those are the ones we are looking for. So if there is a target, it is those companies that maybe arenโ€™t run super professionally or efficiently, or their product sets are kind of rounding first and heading to second base, and we can get them around to third and headed home. That is what we are looking for, and thatโ€™s why we donโ€™t mess with the institutional-backed companies or the companies that have taken on cash because that is usually not them. We want the rough. That is what we are looking for as far as a profile.โ€

โ€œWe donโ€™t invest in companies just to invest. We want to be able to help and step in and provide some assistance. If we can get a polished, great company in which everything is perfect and they are not asking an arm and a leg for it, we will do that deal, but that is not the profile that we are proactively looking for. We are looking for really cool, innovative products that we can help build out.โ€

 

Leadership Teams Remain Intact

Inhabit IQ retains the leadership teams in its investments. โ€œOur operating thesis has been to buy these companies and make sure that the entire leadership team staysโ€”which is why we donโ€™t do full acquisitions. These are investments because we want to be aligned going forward with the CEOs and management teams within these companies, all striving for the same thing, which is continuing to drive growthโ€”just more quickly with access to more resources.โ€

Is there a point that Inhabit IQ would remove a CEO? According to Chad, yes. โ€œI can speak from experience that this happened twice on the multi-family side when we did do that. They were making decisions for their business that were disruptive toโ€”not only to their businessโ€”but to closing down integrations, not wanting to partner. You canโ€™t do that.โ€

He added, โ€œWe are looking to grow and expand these companies, and if the leadership discontinues doing that and is not aligned in that effort, then we will make a change.โ€

 

Future of VR Technology

When asked about the future of technology in the VR industry, Chad and Scott were clear that Inhabit IQ believes in broad connectivity through open APIs and integrations.

Although the company is looking for platforms to add to its portfolio to round out its VR technology ecosystem, it was clear throughout our interview that the paradigm at Inhabit IQ centers around ensuring its customers have choice in the products they want to use, whether or not those products are under the Inhabit IQ umbrella. The duo spoke at length about the importance of open APIs and connectivity with third-party platforms.

โ€œWhen we think about all-in-one solutions, the future is tight, seamless integrations; and while it is the future in this space, it is the present in commercial real estate and in multi-family housing,โ€ Chad said. โ€œWhether that is between our products orโ€”as is the case 99 percent of the timeโ€”between multiple products, it is a requirement among the largest property managers to have plug-and-play solutions with seamless integrations.โ€

He added, โ€œUltimately, and we learned this in the multi-family tech side, property managers drive the decision about who they are going to use. Thatโ€™s why all our companies have open APIs. The goal is to drive the best user experience and not force-feed them a product they donโ€™t want to use.โ€

 

The Future of Inhabit IQโ€™s VR Portfolio

Despite significant pressing in our discussion, Chad and Scott were unwavering that they are not looking to sunset any platforms, in contrast to other technology rollups we have seen in the VR industry. Chad pointed out that they have a history of not retiring platforms: โ€œOf the 24 multi-family companies weโ€™ve added, we have never sunset a platform, and we have no intention of doing that now.โ€

Chad added, โ€œThe ultimate objective is to be able to provide leading-edge technology to all asset classes. We want to be able to service the entire ecosystem of technology for all real estate classes.โ€

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

More articles

9 COMMENTS

Comments are closed.

- Advertisement -

Latest article